Page 1 of 1
Access Rules
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 2:06 pm
by bgateley
Hi,
I can't seem to get my access rules working right. I would like to deny access to everybody except a handful of locations. I have my first rules set to deny *.*.*.*, and then subsequent rules set to allow various sites, such as 123.456.*.* and 234.45*.*.*, however I can still log on from another PC on the network at 192.168.0.2. Can anybody shed any light on this for me? Thanks!
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 12:41 pm
by bgateley
I'm on build 185 and still having problems with the access rules. Here's what I have set up:
Allow 69.210.*.*
Allow 198.7.*.*
Allow 12.164.*.*
Allow 69.11.*.*
Allow 70.10*.*.*
Deny *.*.*.*
This morning in my FTP log I had numerous logon attempts like this:
[#1] [20070420 07:13:30] [202.105.176.20] connected
I have shut down the server, re-booted, and started it up again multiple
times since I've set up these rules. Thanks for any help anybody can give me.
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 12:02 pm
by bgateley
Here's the whole entry (repeated about a thousand times every day):
[#1] [20070424 01:00:35] [72.3.249.100] connected
[#1] [20070424 01:00:35] [Administrator] USER Administrator success
[#1] [20070424 01:00:35] [Administrator] USER Administrator success
[#1] [20070424 01:00:35] [Administrator] disconnected
Maybe I just don't understand what the access rules are doing. I would think that if an IP address was blocked, there wouldn't even be a "connected" message, but maybe I'm wrong?
This is just FTP/SSL.
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 5:25 pm
by bgateley
He's not really logging on successfully, is he? I guess I assumed from the log that he connected and then sent a user name successfully, but then since there is no user name "Administrator", was disconnected.
Thanks for looking into this for me,
Brian
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 12:12 pm
by bgateley
That is the way I have that rule set up, one of our offices has a static IP address, but the first grouping is alway 70 and the second always starts with 10 and then one varying digit (101,102,103, etc.). I hesitated about doing 70.*.*.*, since that would let in a lot wider range of addresses. I will try that though, and see if that makes a difference.