Sorry if this has been mentioned before....
I really like CoreFTP. The only quirk I've found so far is when changing directories.
I often need to work from multiple directories, so whenever I change one (either the local or remote side) I have to press the 'Enter' key in order for the change to actually happen. The "normal" behavior of a drop-down combo-box is to automatically act on the selected/changed value.
I would really really really appreciate it if the action on the directory combo-box could be changed!
Thanks!
Changing directories
More directory woes :(
This may also be a known bug, but I just found it, and it may require me to abandon CoreFTP until a fix is made.
When switching sites (something I do often as I work on a development site and a production site), the directories are not updated so its impossible to upload files without exiting the program and restarting it.
For example, if I'm working on Site1 then connect to site2, the directory for site1 is still displayed in the right-hand window. Even doing a 'refresh' to the directory does not connect it to the correct site.
I have also found that the source directory (left side) does not always get reconnected at various times (especially if the program has sat idle for quite awhile). This is less easy to reproduce but again, these types of issues are a show stopper for me.
I have to be able to rely on the program at least connecting to the proper sites and directories without having to restart the application each time. IMO, this is a serious flaw.
When switching sites (something I do often as I work on a development site and a production site), the directories are not updated so its impossible to upload files without exiting the program and restarting it.
For example, if I'm working on Site1 then connect to site2, the directory for site1 is still displayed in the right-hand window. Even doing a 'refresh' to the directory does not connect it to the correct site.
I have also found that the source directory (left side) does not always get reconnected at various times (especially if the program has sat idle for quite awhile). This is less easy to reproduce but again, these types of issues are a show stopper for me.
I have to be able to rely on the program at least connecting to the proper sites and directories without having to restart the application each time. IMO, this is a serious flaw.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 987
- Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2003 4:37 am
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 987
- Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2003 4:37 am
As an aside:
I personally find the beta builds to usually be quite stable, fixing quite a few of the problems that were in previous builds. "Release early, release often." The developers here tend to abide by that rule. The term "beta" is almost innapropriate for the most up-to-date versions. Developer Build is more appropriate (which I think is what it's called in the download area, actually).
I personally find the beta builds to usually be quite stable, fixing quite a few of the problems that were in previous builds. "Release early, release often." The developers here tend to abide by that rule. The term "beta" is almost innapropriate for the most up-to-date versions. Developer Build is more appropriate (which I think is what it's called in the download area, actually).